I Will Sit Also Upon the Mount of the Congregation
Beattitudes of the Gospel of Matthew
#1
Matthew 5:3
3Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Poor means deficient or lacking, and in this case, Matthew is speaking in the spirit!
Matthew 11:12
12And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#2
Matthew 5:4
4Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
Matthew 8:22
But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.
Luke 9:60
Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God.
Someone tell me how does this make sense?
I don’t believe Jesus would say “let the dead bury the dead“!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#3
Matthew 5:5
5Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Meek means submissive; spiritless,
or meek can mean gentleness!
Is this meek? Let the dead Bury the Dead
Matthew 10:34
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Is this meek?
Matthew 24:35
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
SO much for being blessedly meek.
Heaven and earth shall pass away ……with the meek!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#4
Matthew 5:6
6Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
Matthew 8:19-20
19And a certain scribe came, and said unto him, Master, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest.20And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
Gee, doesn’t sound like this guy was gonna get any satisfaction!
Jesus sounds empty here ( and I mean spaced-out!) and doesn’t have much to offer, not even advice, to fill this man who seemed to hunger and thirst for righteousness in the Gospel of Matthew!
Matthew 25:43-45
43I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.44Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?45Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
Um, what about the scribe? Or was he even less than the least?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#5
Matthew 5:7
7Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Mercy is forgiveness and compassion.
Matthew 10:14-15
14And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.15Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
Matthew 10:34-36
34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.36And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
Matthew 21:43-44
43Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.44And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
Matthew 11:21-24
21Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.22But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you.23And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.24But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.
Compassion?
The fact is this is not Jesus Christ the Son of God. Yes Jesus the Son of God is in the bible but someone, I suspect, has tampered with the truth and inserted themselves, and I think it is Paul of Tarsus (the heel) and Luke who is the author of LUKE and Acts and at least parts of the gospel of Matthew and Mark!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Matthew 5:8
8Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
John 6:46
46Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
IN my opinion the gospel of John portrays the True Jesus Christ, I AM HE, the Messiah, who has a pure heart!
I believe that He is the one that died and arose, and not the renditions of Jesus in the other gospels.
I believe the synoptic gospels are about another, that is not pure in heart!
I think some of the things written may be true in the synoptic, but someone has tampered with a bunch of the written word!
The Deceiver can’t very well deceive, if there isn’t some truth to wrap himself around (like a serpent) or what would be the point!
The deceiver came to corrupt and destroy the truth.
The fact is that the gospels were written by men that were either inspired by God or not inspired by God.
When in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke they say woe unto Chorazin and Capernaum etc….I believe these parts of the bible were added after some catastrophes had occurred to give their gospels preeminence.
Notice they never mention the cities of Italy! How many catastrophies have occurred in Italy alone is astonishing!
How about the destruction of Rome for instance?
That is deceptive, and makes me distrust their testimony to start with!
I believe a certain church is responsible for these additions!
This is Paul
- Matthew 23:27
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.
Matthew 23:26-28 (in Context) Matthew 23 (Whole Chapter) - Acts 23:3
Then said Paul unto him, God shall smite thee, thou whited wall: for sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be smitten contrary to the law?
Acts 24:5
5For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world,
and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:
Acts 26:13-23
13At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.14And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.15And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.16But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;17Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,18To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.19Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:20But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.21For these causes the Jews caught me in the temple, and went about to kill me.22Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:23That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.
Acts 13:6-11
6And when they had gone through the isle unto Paphos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Barjesus:7Which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, a prudent man; who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God.8But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith.9Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,) filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him.10And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?11And now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a season. And immediately there fell on him a mist and a darkness; and he went about seeking some to lead him by the hand.
I believe that the destroyer is who Paul follows!
A fallen angel called Lucifer who causes mayhem, deception, and death!
Isaiah 14:12-13
12How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
To Be Continued in another Post!
BEWARE of Strangers BEARING GIFTS!
(The Gifts of the Roman Catholic Church)
Revelation 13:13
And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight ofmen,
Acts 2:3-4
3And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.4And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
This verse is speaking about the second beast of Revelation that comes out of the earth. I think this has already occurred and it is written about in our bibles:
Acts 2:1-2
1And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.2And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
Revelation 6:13
And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs,
when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
===========================================
In the gospel of John there is no mention of speaking in tongues .
This is a false teaching of the beast!
Speaking in tongues is not taught in the Gospel of John, but is taught in the Synoptic gospels!
Casting out devils in the name of Jesus Christ is not taught in the Gospel of John, but is taught in the Synoptic gospels!
Matthew 13:33
Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took,
andhid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.
(Gramana– ’andhid’ = Dan hid?)
==============================================
I suspect the three measures of meal are the Synoptic Gospels!
(The Gospel of Matthew, the Gospel of Mark, and the Gospel of Luke.)
Cloven tongues like as of fire Take notice of the next verse!
=======================
Ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day.
=========================
Speaking of kindles, isn’t it odd that electronic books are sold as kindles now?
Why are they called kindles?
Ridicule?
Probably!
Definition of kindle :
a. To build or fuel (a fire).
b. To set fire to; ignite.
2. To cause to glow; light up: The sunset kindled the skies.
3. To arouse (an emotion, for example): “No spark had yet kindled in him an intellectual passion” (George Eliot).
v.intr.
1. To catch fire; burst into flame.
2. To become bright; glow.
3. To become inflamed.
4. To be stirred up; rise.
Makes me think of a movie (years ago). No one was allowed to own a book and computers ran their lives in total!
I can just imagine in the future after everyone becomes totally reliant on computers for work, play, education and we become one
like in the Star Trek show
where the Borks take over civilizations!
Then when convenient
someone who has the power
will turn the internet off!
Then what?
===========
Speaking in tongues
7And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah.
8And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof.
====================================
Ephah
An ancient Hebrew unit of dry measure, equal to a tenth of a homer or about one bushel (35 liters).
The poet’s name is homophonous with ὅμερος (hómēros), meaning, generally, “hostage” (or “surety”), long understood as “he who accompanies; he who is forced to follow”, or, in some dialects, “blind”
========================================
Acts 5:5-8
5And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.
6Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language.
7And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?
8And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
| Kiko, Carmen and Fr. Mario, initiators of the Neo Catechumenal Way and promoters of the Domus Galilaeae project, together with the architects who have worked on the plans for the construction, were awaiting him; the Holy Father made no secret of his sincere affection for the initiators of the Neo-Catechumenal Way, and stated “The Lord was waiting for you on this Mount”. After the presentations, the Holy Father blessed the Sanctuary of the Word. The Holy Father gave the impression that he felt at home there to the point that it appeared that he did not want to leave.24 MARCH 2000 |
Nancy Pelosi’s Favorite Word
Neocatechumenal Way
Francisco (Kiko) José Eduardo Argüello (born January 9, 1939) is a Spanish artist and, together with Carmen Hernández, co-initiator of the Neocatechumenal Way
He wondered how it was possible “that we live in a world full of injustices when inside we have a desire for justice.” Through his involvement with a theatre group, he “learned something of the philosophy of Sartre, (No Exit, The Flies, etc.), and in the end Sartre gives us an answer: that the world is absurd, everything is absurd, that we have a craving for justice and live in an unjust world because everything is absurd.” Argüello tried to live “consciously, existentially” the “reality” of Sartrian atheism……
At the height of this crisis, however, Argüello read another philosopher, Bergson, “who says that intuition is a… way…, deeper than reason itself, of arriving at truth. And, surprised, I found that, deep inside, my artist’s intuition did not accept the absurdity of existence; I was aware of the beauty of a tree, of the beauty of things; there is something there that can’t be absurd. Then if the absurd is not the truth, if there is a reason for being… the next step was: then somebody created us…. At that moment… something in me told me that God existed… that God loved me… that I was a son of God. And with great surprise I found… that this God that appeared in my heart, in my deepest soul, was Jesus Christ, the Jesus Christ of the Catholic Church.”[2]
HOW ABSURD!
Wish I Could find information on Carmen Hernández But the link to his name is VACANT and there are thousands of Carmen Hernándezes!
ICONS OF THE NEOCATECHUMENAL WAY
“Sacred images in our churches and homes are intended to awaken and nourish our faith in the mystery of Christ. Through theicon of Christ and his works of salvation, it is he whom we adore. Through sacred images of the holy Mother of God, of the angels and of the saints, we venerate the persons represented. “
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1192
Venerate
Origin: 1615–25; < L venerātus, ptp. of venerārī to solicit the goodwill of (a god), worship, revere, v. deriv. of vener-, s. of venus, presumably in its original sense “desire”; see V
Pope: The Ecclesial Movements are Gifts for the Whole Church
or are they the talent of lead in Zechariah 5:7 above
======================================================
Acts 5:9-11
9Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,10Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews andproselytes,
Proselytes n. A new convert to a doctrine or religion.
Proselyte ——————–> Francisco (Kiko) José Eduardo Argüello
Gramana—————- andproselytes ——->DAN Proselytes
11Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.
Have another drink but be sure to get a cab!
Message to Pope Benedict XVI: BEWARE of Strangers BEARING GIFTS!
Speaking of Bears isn’t that on Pope Benedict’s Coat of Arms
Corbinian’s bear: A legend states that while travelling to Rome, Saint Corbinian’s pack horse was killed by a bear. He commanded the bear to carry the load. Once he arrived, he released it from his service, and it returned to Bavaria. The implication is that “Christianity tamed and domesticated the ferocity of paganism and thus laid the foundations for a great civilisation in the Duchy of Bavaria.” At the same time, Corbinian’s bear, as God’s beast of burden, symbolises the weight of office that Benedict now carries.
The Grace of Anathema Maranatha
anathema
an appeal to some supernatural power to inflict evil on someone or some group;a formal ecclesiastical ban, curse, or excommunication.
maranatha
“As understood here (“O Lord, come!”), it is a prayer for the early return of Christ.
If the Aramaic words are divided differently (Maran atha, “Our Lord has come”), it becomes a credal declaration.
The former interpretation is supported by what appears to be a Greek equivalent of this acclamation in Rev 22:20 “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!””
“It seems to have been customary with the Jews of that age, when they had pronounced any man an Anathema, to add the Syriac expression, Maran – atha, that is, “The Lord cometh;” namely, to execute vengeance upon him.“
———————————–
Interesting that the above says that “it seems to have been customary for Jews of that age,” to say this curse, since it is only said one time in the bible and it was said by Paul of Tarsus! How is that customary?
Please Read this very interesting article:
A Spanish Curse was Decreed over America: The Spanish Requerimiento
Cursing is not of God or His Son!
It is the Thief, the Wolf that Scatters the Sheep, the Deceiver and the Destroyer that curses!
The only people allowed to say this curse are Cardinal Bishops and the Pope!
Doesn’t sound Jewish to me!
—————————————
Corinthians 16:20-24
20All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss.21The salutation of me Paul with mine own hand.22If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him beAnathema Maranatha.23The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.24My love be with you all in Christ Jesus. Amen.
How full of grace is that?
Talk about hypocritical! (I would call that voodoo.)
Paul is Cursing people that don’t believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. How soon he forgets that he was once an unbeliever, further more, a murderer of believers of the real Lord Jesus Christ. Then he is gracing the Lord Jesus Christ’s grace upon whoever he is writing and his great and precious love in Christ Jesus. He is so sweet I don’t think he is believable. So is he for real?
Problem with Paul is which Lord Jesus Christ is he talking about? Is he talking about the true Jesus Christ or the one made up in the synoptic gospels?
I guess Paul felt it necessary to tell that he is writing with his own hand, how commendable. Was his hand someone else’s hand prior? Are we supposed to get goosebumps.
Zechariah 11:17
Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.
It is an odd thing to say : The salutation of me Paul with mine own hand.
Kind of makes me think of John 5:43 below.
John 5:43
I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
He speaks aramaic, hebrew and greek. He is recognized by a roman centurion to be the Greek speaking Egyptian that led 4000 murdering men in the desert.
Acts 21:37-39
37And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek? 38Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers? 39But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
The expression Anathema Maranatha is a Syriac/Greek expression and
A man who avoids capture and watches idly by as a Jewish man is beaten, because of that love that wafts around his holiness. A man who stirs up strife between Sadducees and Pharisees to ooze out of his crimes. He is the type of guy to say anything to squeeze out of everything. A man who chased down and arrested and killed Christians.
I believe he had a change of tactics (from his god Lucifer-the Eye of Horus) on the road to Damascus to infiltrate the true believers enabling him to find them, kill them, destroy their written scripture to replace with his own version of scripture and his own god and his own image of Jesus Christ, because he is the destroyer and the wolf who scatters the sheep!
A man that was an Egyptian, a Roman citizen, a Jew, the son of a Pharisee, born of Tarsus,
a murderer, a thief, and a liar,
and more than likely Simon’s son.
John 5:43
I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
He is the another spoken of by the true Jesus Christ!
Corinthians 16:24.
My love be with you all in Christ Jesus.
Sure does appear that Jesus Christ is referring to Saul/Paul!
John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
—————————————————–
Maranatha
Mar : tr.v., marred, mar·ring, mars.To inflict damage, especially disfiguring damage, on.To impair the soundness, perfection, or integrity of; spoil.n. A disfiguring mark; a blemish.
Anatha
means eternal
Anathema
Anath is a Chaldean deity worshipped by Caananites
————————————————————————
Why would anyone want to curse someone eternally? As human beings we don’t have the right to curse another person because they don’t believe, because one day they might believe. I think Paul was anti-Christian and a believer in his own god which uses the same name of Jesus Christ but is a corrupted image of the true Jesus Christ.
Why would Paul promote the word Amen knowing it is an Egyptian god? Isn’t that odd? Nowadays, most people believe Amen means “So be it” but that is not all that it means!
The same kind of double meaning with the curse in the title Maranatha Anathema. It’s a demonic-code double-speak to fool the innocent and naïve people.
May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells and your thigh wastes away. ‘Then the woman is to say, “Amen. So be it.” (New International version)
If Amen means ‘So be it’ then why say ‘So be it’ again?
By the way I think this is false teaching of the Old Testament and was also corruption by Egyptian (Eye of Horus) influence! IT is like voodoo and very anti-women and very priestly! Never were men put to this test when they sinned or were suspected of sinning! It is anti-women and very superstitious. I wonder how many women were condemned that were innocent? Makes me think of the witch trials in Salem.
The Antichrist will hate women, Jews, Jesus Christ and believers. He is not gonna tell ya that he hates you and I, because that would give it away who he is, That is why he is also called the deceiver!
1 Corinthians 14:16
Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?
Do you understand what Paul is saying? I don’t. It’s kind of like my ex. Some of his writings do rable and seems to me he might have been schitzophrenic, possibly, a psychopath maybe, more than likely a sociopath?
IF you do a search in the online bible of “amen” IT looks more like a chant, and that, I believe, is premeditated corruption in the OT and the NT from the Egyptian god amen and ITS adherents and whoever are the copyists:
Romans 16:22
I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, salute you in the Lord. of the scriptures!
Reminder: Amen does not appear in the bible until after Exodus of the Old Testament when the Jews were freed from their slavery in Egypt by the
Hand of God (I Am That I Am)
and Moses.
Remember Passover?
Remember the Parting of the Red Sea?
The Egyptians did not let the Jews go free without malice.
And Paul was recognized in Rome as the Greek-speaking Egyptian that led a revolt of 4000 murdering men in the desert!
I can live without Paul’s version of Grace and his version of Jesus Christ……Thank you!
Crowd stunned after valedictorian rips up speech, recites Lord’s prayer
(If you enjoyed this article there are many more on Home Page and New and Revised Articles)
The Vatican-The Family Business-The Vatican City
Authors defend Pope Benedict, say sex crisis will mold legacy
Sounds premeditated to me!
“Q: Why can’t Benedict just fire bishops who protected abusive priests and make new rules for the whole church?”
“E: The Catholic church is not a multinational corporation with bishops as branch managers that the pope can hire, fire and mandate actions. It’s much more complicated. In history and canon law, bishops are descendents of the apostles. It would be like Peter firing James. … But it’s pretty clear that he is chiding the bishops as a group and individually. There’s definitely some steel there.”
SO who are these Bishops that run the vatican? IF they are the supposed descendants of the apostle Peter and James and they are not allowed to marry how do they procreate themselves? IS there a breeding machine we don’t know about?
Pope being set up over Munich sex abuse case, says Vatican
“Pope Benedict XVI has said he was ‘shocked’ to hear of the Munich sex abuse case.”
Oh, really?
—————–
The fall guy:
Priest says he was pressurised into taking blame for pope
Sounds like the Mafia!
Vatican’s Lays Out Legal Defense
Vatican to claim bishops are not ’employees’ May 17 2010 Times Online
But the Pope picks the Cardinal Bishops, doesn’t he?
I think the Vatican is a corporation! So IT is a business!
Vatican detains ‘Pope’s butler’ as suspect in leaks probe 25 May 2012
Did the corporation abuse the kids or the priests? IN MY OPINION Both the priests and the corporation abused the kids by their collusion for silence.
Emanuela Orlandi ‘was kidnapped for sex parties for Vatican police’
John-John (or rather JFK jr.) and Caroline Kennedy lookalikes?
What if the Vatican, Vatican City, Cardinal Bishops, Bishops and Priests have
organized a sex-ring to get favors from other countries?
That would explain their silence!
That would explain their defenders too!
Papal aide, Vatican men’s choir in gay prostitution ring
“Balducci’s religious fervor and persistence in the shadow of power have proven crucial aspects of the “gelatinous system” denounced by the judge investigating the awarding of lucrative public works contracts.”
HMMMMMMMMMMMM
Indoctrination would be a cinch for them since they teach tots, children, teens and college age children in their private schools and publically-funded education and religious systems. They have had lots of practice!
“Thousands flock to Vatican to show support for Pope Benedict XVI over child sex abuse scandal“
Rome‘s center-right Mayor Gianni Alemanno was in the crowd, along with other pro-Vatican Italian officials.
“We want to show our solidarity to the pope and transmit the message that single individuals make mistakes but institutions, faith and religion cannot be questioned,” Alemanno told Associated Press Television News. “We will not allow this.”
————————————–
UNIONS?
Maybe it is the Unions that should be sued that award “lucrative public works contracts” to those that support the Vatican sexual abuse!
I think it is proven in my posts that the premise that they cannot fire these bishops because they are descendants of the apostles is a lie. They are not descendants of the apostles! If anything, they are descendants of false apostles that actually annihilated the true apostles, destroyed their scripture, and purposefully mocked the truth wherever they could find it!
The autonomy of bishops, and suing the Vatican
“Jeffrey Lena, the Vatican’s lawyer in the US, said the Vatican would assert that bishops are not its employees because they are not paid by Rome, don’t act on Rome’s behalf and are not controlled day-to-day by the pope — factors courts use to determine whether employers are liable for the actions of their employees.”
Who pays the bishops?
Who is The Vatican?
Vatican by wickepedia “Vatican may refer to:…”
It appears Wickopedia doesn’t know who the Vatican is in this link above!
Maybe it is the Vatican City that should be sued?????
Vatican City was established in 1929. (Lateran Treaty)
“The two entities even have distinct passports”(Holy See & the Vatican City)
‘Body Of Christ’ Snatched From Church, Held Hostage By UCF Student
“The church feels that I’m the problem here,” Cook said. “The problem is actually that this is a publicly-funded religious institution. Through student government here, we fund them through an activity and service, so they’re receiving student money.”
==================================================
Never the less, money isn’t gonna help! They will just print more!
Leaving the false church is the key!
Revelation 18:4And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
=================================================
Revelation 17:7 When I saw her, I was greatly astonished. Then the angel said to me: “Why are you astonished? I will explain to you the mystery of the woman and of the beast she rides, which has the seven heads and ten horns.
Who are the Seven Heads?
“Ordinances of Vatican City are published in Italian; official documents of the Holy See are issued mainly in Latin.”
Why?
“Vatican City is an ecclesiastical[5] or sacerdotal–monarchical[6] state, ruled by the bishop of Rome—the Pope. The highest state functionaries are all Catholic clergymen of various nationalities. It is the sovereign territory of the Holy See (Sancta Sedes) and the location of the Pope’s residence, referred to as the Apostolic Palace.”
And there are seven Kings (POPES) since 1929
Revelation 17:10And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
Revelation 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Who are the 10 horns?
Maybe they are the Cardinal Bishops!!!!!
Cardinal Bishops: Sodano, Angelo– Emeritus Secretary of State of Vatican City — Aged 82 Gantin, Bernardin– Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for Bishops — Aged 88 (now deceased) Etchegaray, Roger– President Emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace — Aged 87 *López Trujillo, Alfonso– President of the Pontifical Council for the Family — Aged 74 *Re, Giovanni Battista– Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops — Aged 76 *Arinze, Francis– Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments — Aged 77 Sfeir, Nasrallah Pierre– Patriarch of Antioch for Maronites — Aged 90 Ghattas, Stephanos II– Patriarch Emeritus of Alexandria of the Copts — Aged 90 *Daoud, Ignace Moussa I– Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches — Aged 79 Delly, Emmanuel III– Patriarch of Babylon of the Chaldeans — Aged 82
Total Cardinal Bishops (including Patriarch-Cardinals): 10
=================================================
In addition to the named cardinals, a pope may name cardinals in pectore, Latin for in the breast. A cardinal named in pectore is known only to the pope; not even the cardinal so named is aware of his elevation. Cardinals are named in pectore to protect them or their congregations from reprisals if their identities were known.
If conditions change such that a secret cardinal would be safe, the pope may at any time make public a previously in pectorecardinal, who ranks in precedence with those of his original consistory. If a pope dies before revealing the identity of an in pectorecardinal, the cardinalate expires.
This was the case with Pope John Paul II, who named an in pectore cardinal during his tenure that remained secret even on his death on April 2, 2005. Many speculated that the Holy Father’s will would contain the name of the in pectore cardinal, but it did not.
===================================================
Maybe they are the 10 nations of ASEAN
Nevertheless and neverthemore Today’s Christianity is exploding and imploding. In my opinion, the reason for this craziness is they worship a false GOD and a false image of Jesus Christ that their false apostles and “their descendants” made up. I believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God, but his image has been altered intentionally over the years by those ‘descendants of the false apostle named Saul/Paul of Tarsus and his family.’ The heal that has been raised against Jesus Christ as He told us would happen in the gospel of John when He washed the true apostles feet. Can it be any plainer?
The insanity ongoing in the churches is because of the poison injected into the bible, the destruction of the truth, and the mock of the gospel of John about Jesus Christ by the other three synoptic gospels and the book of Acts. No one wants or dares to discern what is true and what is false, but would rather knead it all together into a big dough-ball. Even worse now they want to add more leaven to create the Universal Church which is even more ridiculous.
IT IS A MESS!
I think the same thing happened to Israel when Jesus Christ came the first time. The Old Testament and true worship of the true God had been monumentally corrupted. I believe Jesus will be returning soon because things can’t get much worse than they are world-wide, spiritually and physically, and every witch way.
Wake up!
Leave the False Church, do not bow down to false gods or images (Shroud of Turin), learn the truth and discern, pray and honor the Sabbath (7th day)! And of course don’t forget the other 8 commandments and the commandment of Jesus Christ to love each other! (which these days may seem very difficult, but it is a commandment that is the utmost importance!)
Believe in the one true God and His Son Jesus Christ!
(If you enjoyed this article there are many more on Home Page and New and Revised Articles)
I Am That I Am (The Sign)
My Memorial
Exodus 3:13-15
13And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?14And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.15And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel,the LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you:
this is my name for ever,
and this is my memorial unto
all generations.
Isaiah 48:11-12
11For mine own sake, even for mine own sake, will I do it: for how should my name be polluted?
and I will not give my glory unto another.
12Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he;
I am the first, I also am the last.
======================
Isaiah 48:21-22
21And they thirsted not when he led them through the deserts: he caused the waters to flow out of the rock for them: he clave the rock also, and the waters gushed out.
22There is no peace, saith the LORD, unto the wicked.
—————————-
Isaiah 49:26
26AndI will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh;
and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine:
and all flesh
shall know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.
=========================
Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I.
I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.
Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things.
Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that
I am he.
Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he.
They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.
As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he,
they went backward,
and fell to the ground.
========================
Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he: if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:
The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke do NOT include that Jesus says “I am he.”
Not once!
However they do say ‘I am” but I believe that their account is false because their renditions of Jesus Christ makes no attempt to educate anyone in their gospels as to who He is and who He represents and what His name is!
Please read my post called Tell No Man.
These following three verses are the only time that the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke say anything remotely similar:
Matthew 26:32
But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee.
And this Jesus Christ is not telling the truth, because the real Jesus Christ met with Mary Magdalene the morning of the first day after He had risen and then
visited the disciples behind closed doors that same day in the evening (when they received the Holy Spirit) and eight days later when Thomas was present with the disciples, and then He visited them at the sea of Galilee.
So this rendition of Jesus Christ was not privy to what really happened!
Mark 14:61-62
But he held his peace, and answered nothing.Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?62And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
Same goes for this rendition of Jesus Christ!
Luke 22:70-71
Then said they all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he said unto them, Ye say that I am.71And they said, What need we any further witness? for we ourselves have heard of his own mouth.
Very ambiguous and strange! Seems to me this rendition of Jesus Christ is side-stepping in his response and basically he says that he is not saying he is the Son of God but that the council is saying that he is the Son of God. SO he isn’t really sure he really is or not (relying on others to tell him) in the Gospel of Luke and He is confident about His identity in the Gospel of John.
When God told Moses his name and who to tell the Hebrews he was he did not say
“Whom do men say that I am?” or “Whom do ye say that I am?” or “Ye say that I am,” or “What do you think, Neil Cavuto?”
He didn’t ask for an opinion, nor did he ask for a vote,
He said who He was.)
If you get my drift!
Yet
John 19:19-22
19And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.20This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.21Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.22Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.
In the gospel of John
Jesus does say that I am King of the Jews!
John 19:33-37
33But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs:34But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.35And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe.36For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken.37And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.
I find it interesting that the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke do NOT include the side of Jesus being pierced and water coming out.
What this means to me is that the gospel of John is telling the truth about who Jesus really is and the other gospels are not.
I think that is what Jesus was telling us in his statements about his name in the gospel of John in the beginning of this post!
That is why the gospels do not agree with each other because some are false representations (images) of who he is, what he did, and why he came!
John 5:43-47
43I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.44How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?45Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.46For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me.47But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
Isaiah 43:10-12
“You are My witnesses,” says the Lord, “and My servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I am He. Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me. I, even I, am the Lord, and besides Me there is no savior. I have declared and saved, I have proclaimed, and there was no foreign god among you; therefore you are My witnesses,” says the Lord, “that I am God.”
John 19:19-22
19And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.20This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.21Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.22Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.
Please read:
I AM THAT I AM (Part two)
(If you enjoyed this article there are many more on Home Page and New and Revised Articles)
Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised
Thieves and Robbers
John 10:1-8
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.2But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.3To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.4And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.5And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.6This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.7Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep
.8All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers:
IT appears that there were others that came before Jesus Christ.
I wonder who they were?
Could Jesus Christ be talking about the other three synoptic gospels and their rendition of
him that comes before this one?
Is the denial of Peter 3 times because the church that uses Peter as their mascot refused to tell about Jesus written about in the Gospel of John? Instead did Peter go under a malign influence to cheat humans of the truth? Who did he serve and defend. Who benefitted?
==========================================
LEGION
Matthew 26:53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Mark 5:9 And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.
The word ‘LEGION’ is not in the Old Testament and I am sure the true Jesus Christ would
never even say the word!
Legion is originally a roman word, not a Jewish word!
Why would Mark’s rendition of Jesus Christ care what the evil demon’s names were? What difference does it make what they are called? Was this an education in demonology?
Oh yea, this is based on a Greek mythology anyway!
Of course, this Jesus Christ was shunned because the people were afraid!
Maybe they sensed evil!
Luke 8:30And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him.
Here we go again. This Jesus is asking the names of the demons? Why? Does it matter what their names are? Does Legion mean something in demonology?
BEELZEBUB
Beezlebub is mentioned quite often in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. I find that interesting!!!!
No one compared Jesus Christ to Beezlebub in the gospel of John!
Luke 8:46And Jesus said, Somebody hath touched me: for I perceive that virtue is gone out of me.
Uh, this is a bit weird. So we can suck the virtue out of Jesus by touching him. Give me a break! And this Jesus could not figure out who it was that sucked the virtue out of him until he saw a woman trembling.
Luke 8:49-56 While he yet spake, there cometh one from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying to him, Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master.50But when Jesus heard it, he answered him, saying, Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole.51And when he came into the house, he suffered no man to go in, save Peter, and James, and John, and the father and the mother of the maiden.52And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth.53And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead.54And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise.55And her spirit came again, and she arosestraightway: and he commanded togive her meat.56And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done.
=================================
BELIEVE ONLY vs. BELIEVE IN I AM
Jesus Christ says “Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole.” Believe what?
Believe that she shall be made whole, or believe in Him?
IN the gospel of John Jesus talks to Martha about Lazarus who has been dead 4 days:
John 11:23-25
Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again. 24 Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. 25 Jesus said unto her,I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Please Read the Post Linked – I Am That I Am (The Sign) which explains who Jesus Christ is and His name!
MEAT vs. BREAD
Then the synoptic rendition of Jesus Christ commands that the girl be fed meat. What is it about meat and the synoptic gospels? Meat, meat, meat, and more meat!
Perhaps it’s because in the Gospel of John, Jesus Christ says He is the Living Bread that came down from heaven?
For the breadof God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”
Then Jesus declared, “I am the breadof life. He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.
I am the breadoflife.
I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This breadis my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
=================================
TELL NO MAN
IN Luke 8:56 above, this rendition of Jesus Christ charges the astonished parents to tell no man what was done!
Here we go again, this Jesus charges the parents to tell no man. What?
Why?
This is getting to be habitual “telling no man.”
Jesus Christ was not trying to” get attention” for His benefit, nor came to offend. I believe He came to illustrate to the chosen apostles, the people, and the Chief Priests, Pharisees, Sadducees, who He is and to teach us the truth about His Father.
He did not tell the recipients of His miracles to tell no man in the Gospel of John! Why would Jesus say, “Tell no man,” in the first three synoptic gospels?
Besides didn’t the people at the synagogue, the people outside and inside the home know?
Did Jesus tell them to ‘Tell no man?
NO. He did not!
So this must have been said for “another reason“, because it obviously was told because it is in the bible!
Strange to say the least!
YET
In Luke 8:38-39 below Jesus sends the man away and says to show what great things God has done and so he publishes it.
Luke 8:38-39 Now the man out of whom the devils were departed besought him that he might be with him: but Jesus sent him away, saying, 39 Return to thine own house, and shew how great things God hath done unto thee. And he went his way, and published throughout the whole city how great things Jesus had done unto him.
Does this make sense?
The expression, “Tell No Man” is used in the book of Acts!
The author of Acts is Luke:
Acts 23:22 So the chief captain then let the young man depart, and charged him, See thou tell no man that thou hast shewed these things to me.
Did Luke salt the gospels with his propaganda and his own Jesus?
It is obvious that he did!
Back to the little girl in Luke 8:49-56 above: Why in the world would these people be laughing him to scorn? If there was a kid that you are wailing and weeping about because she is dead (obviously knowing her or you would not be weeping and wailing) then turn around and start laughing to scorn because someone you call ‘Master’ says that she isn’t dead, but sleeping? Does this sound like normal people to you? This sounds like a bunch of lunatics. IF I were that little girl I would be feigning death also!
===================================
I AM THAT I AM
John 10:9
I am the door: but the sheep did not hear them.
9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
Again Jesus says in vs. I am the door of the sheep and then again He says in vs. 9 I am the door.
In the Gospel of John, Jesus Christ clarifies who He is and His name. In the linked post called, I Am That I Am (The Sign) illustrates that the three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) do not disclose the name I AM in their rendition of Jesus Christ.
The first three synoptic gospels seem to have John’s gospel as a reference, but they go to great lengths to oppose everything written in the Gospel of John to the point of being a totally different Jesus with a different message.
LAZARUS
Why do the first three gospels omit the miracle of Lazarus, yet have the alabaster box with Mary, yet without Lazarus, and they call Mary a sinner instead of her name, etc? Do priests not like women? Why pick on her? IN the gospel of John the priests wanted to kill Lazarus and apprehend Jesus because the Jews were following Him and not them. Could the first three gospels be written by those priests? I am suspicious to say the least!
John 12:9-11
Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus’ sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.10But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;11Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.
And the next day after the Dinner in Bethany (where coincidentally Mary, Martha and Lazarus lived) Jesus arrived at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem on the colt of an ass where the people met him:
John 12:13
Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.
Sure doesn’t seem like Jesus and his disciples were fleeing, nor hiding from the people, or the priests, yet the synoptic Jesus is often telling the people that received the benefit of the miracles to tell no man. Everyone seems to know about the miracle in Bethany. Jesus did not tell them to “tell no man!”
If no man was told how come the people reacted by greeting Jesus Christ when he arrived in Jerusalem to the Jewish Feast in verse John 12:13 above?
In fact, the people seemed to believe in Him and were expressing their faith unlike the synoptic Jesus that asked the demons their names and the people tell him to get lost (my words, but probably something like it).
The gospel of Luke does not even mention the adoration bestowed by the people when Jesus Christ entered Jerusalem on the colt of an ass. Not one reference to this event in the gospel of Luke and yet Luke is the “great historian” according to all the great and learned scholars! Maybe they laud him because he was great at re-writing history so that they could deceive the people and make money!
Actually, I think that Luke was Jealous of the true Jesus Christ! He wanted the attention and devotion and that is why he left that event out of his ‘historical account’!
John 12:19-20
The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world is gone after him.20And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast:
The Pharisees and the Greeks seem to be upset!
Who is ye?
Ye Meaning and Definition (adv.) Yea; yes. (n.) An eye.
(pron.) The plural of the pronoun of the second person in the nominative case.
What do they mean by Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing?
Who is Ye?
Prevail: 1. To be greater in strength or influence; triumph: prevailed against the enemy.
Jesus seemed to be prevailing over them and whoever it is that they represented.
Who did the Pharisees, the Greeks and the Chief Priests represent?
Did they represent Amen? A FALSE JESUS CHRIST?
It seems that what Jesus had accomplished when he raised Lazarus from the dead had caused quite a stir and the people were following him. The Pharisees and the Greeks were distressed, and the Chief Priests wanted to kill Lazarus. Now it is troubling when men in positions of “Chief Priests” would desire to murder a young man for being raised from the dead! It’s not like Lazarus had committed any crime! What was their reasoning? Would they prevail over Jesus Christ if they killed Lazarus?
Would they prevail if they could get rid of Lazarus THEN the people would believe them instead of Him? That seems to be their motive, to get the people to follow them instead of Jesus Christ, so therefore they needed to kill Lazarus. Did the Pharisees, Greeks, and the Chief Priests even consider who Jesus Christ was? It seemed what mattered to them is that they were losing the people. The people were believing in Jesus Christ and not whoever it is that they were promoting!
Who or what were they endorsing? Was it a false Messiah?
The fact is that Lazarus was killed by them in their 3 synoptic gospels. He isn’t even mentioned in the gospels of Matthew and Mark. In the gospel of Luke, Lazarus is dead and in heaven instead of having been raised by Jesus Christ after having been dead for 4 days. The miracle of the raising of Lazarus is the miracle that turned the tide so that the people believed in Jesus Christ to the point that the Chief Priests wanted to kill Jesus Christ and Lazarus, and it seems that the chief Priests succeeded in killing Lazarus in their synoptic gospels! He just isn’t there. No mention of him in the gospels of Matthew and Mark, and Lazarus is dead in the gospel of Luke!
They have the story of the allabaster box, but without Mary and Martha. Did the Chief Priests want to kill them, too? IT seems that they did, because they do not even mention Mary and Martha. They just wrote that some sinner woman “pops in” to apply oil with her hair on the head and feet of their rendition of Jesus Christ.
I think the synoptic gospels are PROPAGANDA gospels written to disguise the truth and to confuse us about what really happened!
The Chief Priests do not want you to believe in the real Jesus Christ, or know his name, or his real miracles. They want you to believe in their rendition of Jesus Christ and thereby the world will keep following them. IT was about them….not you, or me…not the real Jesus Christ, but them! SO they deleted the truth in their gospels, made up their own gospel so that the world would follow them.
How else can they make a living?
It appears THE PHARISEES, THE GREEKS AND THE CHIEF PRIESTS are in cahoots together to destroy JESUS, LAZARUS, MARTHA and MARY in order TO GET THE UPPER HAND so that THEY WILL PREVAIL INSTEAD OF JESUS CHRIST!
Did they try to kill Jairus and his little girl?…..NO, they did not! Why?
Because it is an ‘historical lie’ to counter the truth of the miracle of the raising of Lazarus from the dead!
===============================
WOLF SMITES THE SHEPHERD AND SCATTERS THE SHEEP
John 10:10-12
The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.11I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.12But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.
Who are the hirelings? Are the hirelings the Pharisees, the Greeks and the Chief Priests?
Are the hirelings the false renditions of Jesus Christ in the first three gospels?
Are the Hirelings the synoptic disciples? Are they the 70 disciples that Luke (who wasn’t there) speaks about that went in twos and drove out demons in his name?
John 10:13-18The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.14I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.15As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.16And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.17Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.18No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
IN the first three synoptic gospels Jesus gets caught in the Garden of Gethsamane and the disciples flee i.e. scattered. Even in those three gospels the synoptic Jesus predicts that they will be offended and be scattered. But the prediction or prophecy was written after the fact, so it is not much of a prophecy! But the synoptic Jesus does offend the synoptic disciples and they do flee in their fulfilled prophetic synoptic gospels even though it was written years and years later.
In the gospel of John, Jesus meets the mob of Chief Priests and Pharisees in the Garden of Gethsamane purposefully and the disciples don’t flee. Instead of fleeing, Jesus asks that they be allowed to go their way:
John 18:4-9
Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye? 5They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.6As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground.7Then asked he them again, Whom seek ye? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth.8Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he: if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:9That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.
The disciples are allowed to go their way ….and they are not scattered.
IN FACT, PETER FOLLOWS JESUS CHRIST AND THE MOB TO THE PLACE OF INTERROGATION!
HOW IS THAT SCATTERING?
THIS IS RECORDED IN ALL THE GOSPELS THAT PETER FOLLOWED AFTER CHRIST.
Mark 14:50And they all forsook him, and fled.
The gospel of Mark contradicts itself because Peter followed Jesus Christ and the mob and was at the same place where Jesus was being interrogated by the council when he denies Jesus 3 times. So I guess Peter did not flee. Hmmmmmmm
Matthew 26:56 But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.
The gospel of Matthew also seems to contradict itself because it says that Peter followed so that he could deny Christ 3 times. So I am guessing they did not all flee!
To me it seems odd that both Matthew 26:31 and Mark 14:27 say “I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad” when in the gospel of John:
John 10:12
But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.
Therefore,if the hireling is the one that smites the shepherd and scatters the sheep then the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke and their rendition of Jesus Christ that say that he (Jesus Christ) will smite the shepherd and scatter the sheep are the hireling and they are the false gospels!!!!!!!!!!!
The LORD OF hosts
host (hōst) noun
a wafer of the bread used in a Eucharistic service
a consecrated Eucharistic wafer
one who entertains guests either at home or elsewhere
intransitive verb, transitive verb
to act as host or hostess (for)
noun
an army
a multitude; great number
Zechariah 13:7 Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the LORD of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.
This is the deceiver, the destroyer, and the thief that Jesus Christ warned us about.
This is the wolf that scatters the sheep! This is the LORD of hosts of the false Jesus Christ i.e. the false shepherd and his false apostles!
This LORD of hosts is a false god and he represents The Eye of Horus!
Matthew 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Matthew 23:39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord
It’s a bit strange, but I believe I read an article in June of 2009 about Pope Benedict XVI’s tour in May 2009. He was at the airport in Israel for his Middle East Tour and was greeted by Shimon Perez who said “Blessed is he that comes in the name of the Lord”. That is what alarmed me about the times we are in, because I remembered that phrase and knew it was important. So I started researching what had been occurring in Israel and worldwide that I could get my hands on via the internet news. Since then that same news article disappeared and was replaced by another where Shimon Perez says something totally different than that particular phrase.
I figured that the propaganda machine was at work and so I tried to find the article and could not find it! I could kick myself—–but that’s what I get for being asleep at the time!
AGAINST ITSELF
Matthew 12:30He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.
Matthew 26:31 Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.
Was Matthew’s Jesus against himself?
Mark 14:27 And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered.
Was Mark’s Jesus against himself?
Luke 11:23 He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.
Was Luke’s Jesus against himself?
Mark 10:18 “Why do you callmegood?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.
Luke 18:19 “Why do you callmegood?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.
Yep, it appears as if Mark’s Jesus and Luke’s Jesus were against themselves!
================================
But in reality, they were against the true Jesus Christ and through their synoptic gospels they have used every trick in the book to deceive, because they represent thieves and robbers!
I believe it makes a difference to God which Jesus Christ we believe in!
It makes a difference to the Antichrist because they need you to rebel with them against the truth, against Jesus Christ and against God the Father so that they can fulfill the prophecy in Revelation and have the whole world be at war with God.
(If you enjoyed this article there are many more on Home Page and New and Revised Articles)
My Other Blogs : Merangue’s Blog, Blue Skies, Eye of a Needle, The Keep
Merangue's Blog 