Merangue's Blog

Christian Truth, Deception & Prophecy

Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised


Thieves and Robbers

John 10:1-8

Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.2But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.3To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.4And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.5And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.6This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.7Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep

.8All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers:

IT appears that there were others that came before Jesus Christ.

I wonder who they were?

Could Jesus Christ be talking about the other three synoptic gospels and their rendition of

him that comes before this one?

Is the denial of Peter 3 times because the church that uses Peter as their mascot refused to tell about Jesus written about in the Gospel of John? Instead did Peter go under a malign influence to cheat humans of the truth? Who did he serve and defend. Who benefitted?

==========================================

LEGION

Matthew 26:53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?

Mark 5:9 And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.

The word ‘LEGION’ is not in the Old Testament and I am sure the true Jesus Christ would

never even say the word!

Legion is originally a roman word, not a Jewish word!

Why would Mark’s rendition of Jesus Christ care what the evil demon’s names were? What difference does it make what they are called? Was this an education in demonology?

Oh yea, this is based on a Greek mythology anyway!

Of course, this Jesus Christ was shunned because the people were afraid!

Maybe they sensed evil!

Luke 8:30And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him.

Here we go again. This Jesus is asking the names of the demons? Why? Does it matter what their names are? Does Legion mean something in demonology?

BEELZEBUB

Beezlebub is mentioned quite often in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. I find that interesting!!!!

No one compared Jesus Christ to Beezlebub in the gospel of John!

Beelzebub

Luke 8:46And Jesus said, Somebody hath touched me: for I perceive that virtue is gone out of me.

Uh, this is a bit weird. So we can suck the virtue out of Jesus by touching him. Give me a break! And this Jesus could not figure out who it was that sucked the virtue out of him until he saw a woman trembling.

Luke 8:49-56 While he yet spake, there cometh one from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying to him, Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master.50But when Jesus heard it, he answered him, saying, Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole.51And when he came into the house, he suffered no man to go in, save Peter, and James, and John, and the father and the mother of the maiden.52And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth.53And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead.54And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise.55And her spirit came again, and she arosestraightway: and he commanded togive her meat.56And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done.

=================================

BELIEVE ONLY vs. BELIEVE IN I AM

Jesus Christ says “Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole.” Believe what?

Believe that she shall be made whole, or believe in Him?

IN the gospel of John Jesus talks to Martha about Lazarus who has been dead 4 days:

John 11:23-25

Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again. 24 Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. 25 Jesus said unto her,I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:

Please Read the Post Linked – I Am That I Am (The Sign) which explains who Jesus Christ is and His name!

MEAT vs. BREAD

Then the synoptic rendition of Jesus Christ commands that the girl be fed meat. What is it about meat and the synoptic gospels? Meat, meat, meat, and more meat!

Perhaps it’s because in the Gospel of John, Jesus Christ says He is the Living Bread that came down from heaven?

John 6:33

For the breadof God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”

John 6:35

Then Jesus declared, I am the breadof life. He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.

John 6:48

I am the breadoflife.

John 6:51

I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This breadis my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

=================================

TELL NO MAN

IN Luke 8:56 above, this rendition of Jesus Christ charges the astonished parents to tell no man what was done!

Here we go again, this Jesus charges the parents to tell no man. What?

Why?

This is getting to be habitual “telling no man.”

Jesus Christ was not trying to” get attention” for His benefit, nor came to offend. I believe He came to illustrate to the chosen apostles, the people, and the Chief Priests, Pharisees, Sadducees, who He is and to teach us the truth about His Father.

He did not tell the recipients of His miracles to tell no man in the Gospel of John! Why would Jesus say, “Tell no man,” in the first three synoptic gospels?

Besides didn’t the people at the synagogue, the people outside and inside the home know?

Did Jesus tell them to ‘Tell no man?

NO. He did not!

So this must have been said for “another reason“, because it obviously was told because it is in the bible!

Strange to say the least!

YET

In Luke 8:38-39 below Jesus sends the man away and says to show what great things God has done and so he publishes it.

Luke 8:38-39 Now the man out of whom the devils were departed besought him that he might be with him: but Jesus sent him away, saying,  39 Return to thine own house, and shew how great things God hath done unto thee. And he went his way, and published throughout the whole city how great things Jesus had done unto him.

Does this make sense?

The expression, “Tell No Man” is used in the book of Acts!

The author of Acts is Luke:

Acts 23:22 So the chief captain then let the young man depart, and charged him, See thou tell no man that thou hast shewed these things to me.

Did Luke salt the gospels with his propaganda and his own Jesus?

It is obvious that he did!

Back to the little girl in Luke 8:49-56 above: Why in the world would these people be laughing him to scorn? If there was a kid that you are wailing and weeping about because she is dead (obviously knowing her or you would not be weeping and wailing) then turn around and start laughing to scorn because someone you call ‘Master’ says that she isn’t dead, but sleeping? Does this sound like normal people to you? This sounds like a bunch of lunatics. IF I were that little girl I would be feigning death also!

===================================


I AM THAT I AM


John 10:9

I am the door: but the sheep did not hear them.

I am the doorby me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.

Again Jesus says in vs. I am the door of the sheep and then again He says in vs. I am the door.

In the Gospel of John, Jesus Christ clarifies who He is and His name. In the linked post called, I Am That I Am (The Sign) illustrates that the three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) do not disclose the name I AM in their rendition of Jesus Christ.

The first three synoptic gospels seem to have John’s gospel as a reference, but they go to great lengths to oppose everything written in the Gospel of John to the point of being a totally different Jesus with a different message.


LAZARUS

Why do the first three gospels omit the miracle of Lazarus, yet have the alabaster box with Mary, yet without Lazarus, and they call Mary a sinner instead of her name, etc? Do priests not like women? Why pick on her? IN the gospel of John the priests wanted to kill Lazarus and apprehend Jesus because the Jews were following Him and not them. Could the first three gospels be written by those priests? I am suspicious to say the least!

John 12:9-11

Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus’ sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.10But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;11Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.

And the next day after the Dinner in Bethany (where coincidentally Mary, Martha and Lazarus lived) Jesus arrived at the Jewish Feast in Jerusalem on the colt of an ass where the people met him:

John 12:13

Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Sure doesn’t seem like Jesus and his disciples were fleeing, nor hiding from the people, or the priests, yet the synoptic Jesus is often telling the people that received the benefit of the miracles to tell no man.  Everyone seems to know about the miracle in Bethany. Jesus did not tell them to “tell no man!”

If no man was told how come the people reacted by greeting Jesus Christ when he arrived in Jerusalem to the Jewish Feast in verse John 12:13 above?

In fact, the people seemed to believe in Him and were expressing their faith unlike the synoptic Jesus that asked the demons their names and the people tell him to get lost (my words, but probably something like it).

The gospel of Luke does not even mention the adoration bestowed by the people when Jesus Christ entered Jerusalem on the colt of an ass.  Not one reference to this event in the gospel of Luke and yet Luke is the “great historian” according to all the great and learned scholars! Maybe they laud him because he was great at re-writing history so that they could deceive the people and make money!

Actually, I think that Luke was Jealous of the true Jesus Christ! He wanted the attention and devotion and that is why he left that event out of his ‘historical account’!

John 12:19-20

The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world is gone after him.20And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast:

The Pharisees and the Greeks seem to be upset!

Who is ye?

Ye Meaning and Definition (adv.) Yea; yes. (n.) An eye.

(pron.) The plural of the pronoun of the second person in the nominative case.

What do they mean by Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing?

Who is Ye?

Prevail: 1. To be greater in strength or influence; triumph: prevailed against the enemy.

Jesus seemed to be prevailing over them and whoever it is that they represented.

Who did the Pharisees, the Greeks and the Chief Priests represent?

Did they represent Amen? A FALSE JESUS CHRIST?

It seems that what Jesus had accomplished when he raised Lazarus from the dead had caused quite a stir and the people were following him. The Pharisees and the Greeks were distressed, and the Chief Priests wanted to kill Lazarus. Now it is troubling when men in positions of “Chief Priests” would desire to murder a young man for being raised from the dead! It’s not like Lazarus had committed any crime! What was their reasoning? Would they prevail over Jesus Christ if they killed Lazarus?

Would they prevail if they could get rid of Lazarus THEN the people would believe them instead of Him? That seems to be their motive, to get the people to follow them instead of Jesus Christ, so therefore they needed to kill Lazarus. Did the Pharisees, Greeks, and the Chief Priests even consider who Jesus Christ was? It seemed what mattered to them is that they were losing the people. The people were believing in Jesus Christ and not whoever it is that they were promoting!

Who or what were they endorsing? Was it a false Messiah?

The fact is that Lazarus was killed by them in their 3 synoptic gospels. He isn’t even mentioned in the gospels of Matthew and Mark. In the gospel of Luke, Lazarus is dead and in heaven instead of having been raised by Jesus Christ after having been dead for 4 days. The miracle of the raising of Lazarus is the miracle that turned the tide so that the people believed in Jesus Christ to the point that the Chief Priests wanted to kill Jesus Christ and Lazarus, and it seems that the chief Priests succeeded in killing Lazarus in their synoptic gospels! He just isn’t there. No mention of him in the gospels of Matthew and Mark, and Lazarus is dead in the gospel of Luke!

They have the story of the allabaster box, but without Mary and Martha. Did the Chief Priests want to kill them, too? IT seems that they did, because they do not even mention Mary and Martha. They just wrote that some sinner woman “pops in” to apply oil with her hair on the head and feet of their rendition of Jesus Christ.

I think the synoptic gospels are PROPAGANDA gospels written to disguise the truth and to confuse us about what really happened!

The Chief Priests do not want you to believe in the real Jesus Christ, or know his name, or his real miracles. They want you to believe in their rendition of Jesus Christ and thereby the world will keep following them. IT was about them….not you, or me…not the real Jesus Christ, but them! SO they deleted the truth in their gospels, made up their own gospel so that the world would follow them.

How else can they make a living?

It appears THE PHARISEES, THE GREEKS AND THE CHIEF PRIESTS are in cahoots together to destroy JESUS, LAZARUS, MARTHA and MARY in order TO GET THE UPPER HAND so that THEY WILL PREVAIL INSTEAD OF JESUS CHRIST!

Did they try to kill Jairus and his little girl?…..NO, they did not!  Why?

Because it is an ‘historical lie’ to counter the truth of the miracle of the raising of Lazarus from the dead!

===============================


WOLF SMITES THE SHEPHERD AND SCATTERS THE SHEEP


John 10:10-12

The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.11I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.12But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.

Who are the hirelings? Are the hirelings the Pharisees, the Greeks and the Chief Priests?

Are the hirelings the false renditions of Jesus Christ in the first three gospels?

Are the Hirelings the synoptic disciples? Are they the 70 disciples that Luke (who wasn’t there) speaks about that went in twos and drove out demons in his name?

John 10:13-18The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.14I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.15As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.16And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.17Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.18No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

IN the first three synoptic gospels Jesus gets caught in the Garden of Gethsamane and the disciples flee i.e. scattered. Even in those three gospels the synoptic Jesus predicts that they will be offended and be scattered. But the prediction or prophecy was written after the fact, so it is not much of a prophecy! But the synoptic Jesus does offend the synoptic disciples and they do flee in their fulfilled prophetic synoptic gospels even though it was written years and years later.

In the gospel of John, Jesus meets the mob of Chief Priests and Pharisees in the Garden of Gethsamane purposefully and the disciples don’t flee. Instead of fleeing, Jesus asks that they be allowed to go their way:

John 18:4-9

Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye? 5They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.6As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground.7Then asked he them again, Whom seek ye? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth.8Jesus answered, I have told you that I am he: if therefore ye seek me, let these go their way:9That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none.

The disciples are allowed to go their way ….and they are not scattered.

IN FACT, PETER FOLLOWS JESUS CHRIST AND THE MOB TO THE PLACE OF INTERROGATION!

HOW IS THAT SCATTERING?

THIS IS RECORDED IN ALL THE GOSPELS THAT PETER FOLLOWED AFTER CHRIST.

Mark 14:50And they all forsook him, and fled.

The gospel of Mark contradicts itself because Peter followed Jesus Christ and the mob and was at the same place where Jesus was being interrogated by the council when he denies Jesus 3 times. So I guess Peter did not flee. Hmmmmmmm

Matthew 26:56 But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.

The gospel of Matthew also seems to contradict itself because it says that Peter followed so that he could deny Christ 3 times. So I am guessing they did not all flee!

To me it seems odd that both Matthew 26:31 and Mark 14:27 say “I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad”  when in the gospel of John:

John 10:12

But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.

Therefore,if the hireling is the one that smites the shepherd and scatters the sheep then the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke and their rendition of Jesus Christ that say that he (Jesus Christ) will smite the shepherd and scatter the sheep are the hireling and they are the false gospels!!!!!!!!!!!

The LORD OF hosts

host (hōst)  noun

a wafer of the bread used in a Eucharistic service

a consecrated Eucharistic wafer

one who entertains guests either at home or elsewhere

intransitive verb, transitive verb

to act as host or hostess (for)

noun

an army

a multitude; great number

Zechariah 13:7 Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the LORD of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.

This is the deceiver, the destroyer, and the thief that Jesus Christ warned us about.

This is the wolf that scatters the sheep! This is the LORD of hosts of the false Jesus Christ i.e. the false shepherd and his false apostles!

This LORD of hosts is a false god and he represents The Eye of Horus!

Matthew 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

Matthew 23:39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord

It’s a bit strange, but I believe I read an article in June of 2009 about Pope Benedict XVI’s tour in May 2009. He was at the airport in Israel for his Middle East Tour and was greeted by Shimon Perez who said “Blessed is he that comes in the name of the Lord”.  That is what alarmed me about the times we are in, because I remembered that phrase and knew it was important. So I started researching what had been occurring in Israel and worldwide that I could get my hands on via the internet news. Since then that same news article disappeared and was replaced by another where Shimon Perez says something totally different than that particular phrase.

I figured that the propaganda machine was at work and so I tried to find the article and could not find it! I could kick myself—–but that’s what I get for being asleep at the time!

AGAINST ITSELF

Matthew 12:30He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

Matthew 26:31 Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.

Was Matthew’s Jesus against himself?

Mark 14:27 And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered.

Was Mark’s Jesus against himself?

Luke 11:23 He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.

Was Luke’s Jesus against himself?

Mark 10:18Why do you callmegood?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.

Luke 18:19Why do you callmegood?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.

Yep, it appears as if Mark’s Jesus and Luke’s Jesus were against themselves!

================================

But in reality, they were against the true Jesus Christ and through their synoptic gospels they have used every trick in the book to deceive, because they represent thieves and robbers!

I believe it makes a difference to God which Jesus Christ we believe in!

It makes a difference to the Antichrist because they need you to rebel with them against the truth, against Jesus Christ and against God the Father so that they can fulfill the prophecy in Revelation and have the whole world be at war with God.

(If you enjoyed this article there are many more on Home Page and New and Revised Articles)

My Other Blogs :  Merangue’s Blog,    Blue Skies,    Eye of a Needle,   The Keep


Advertisements

May 30, 2010 - Posted by | Acts, Antichrist, Chief Priests and the Legion, Luke, Myth vs The Truth, Parables, Pope Benedict, Pope Benedict XVI, Prophecy, Synoptic, Synoptic Delusion, The Gospel of John, The Gospel of Mark (Divide and Circumvent), The Gospel of Matthew, Uncategorized, Zacharias | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

35 Comments »

  1. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Bible Prophecy and Controversy | THE TURRET | November 11, 2010 | Reply

  2. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Bible & Prophecy | Bible&Prophecy | November 11, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by In a Desert Place-Bewildered « Blue Skies | November 16, 2010 | Reply

  4. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by The Dividing of Times – Part One « Blue Skies | February 11, 2011 | Reply

  5. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by The Beasts of Revelation | The Keep | February 26, 2011 | Reply

  6. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Pope Benedict XVI, News, Religion ETC « Eye of a Needle | March 7, 2011 | Reply

  7. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Pope Benedict XVI News, ETC « Eye of a Needle | March 7, 2011 | Reply

  8. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by 153 Hail Mary’s and 153 Hilda | The Drawbridge | March 20, 2011 | Reply

  9. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, and the Pope | The Fortress | March 29, 2011 | Reply

  10. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson « Eye of a Needle | March 30, 2011 | Reply

  11. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by The Covenant with Many « Eye of a Needle | March 31, 2011 | Reply

  12. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by Mel Gibson, George Gänswein, Joseph Ratzinger and The Covenant with Many « Blue Skies | April 1, 2011 | Reply

  13. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – (please read) […]

    Pingback by Assassination of JFK and The Covenant with Many | The Drawbridge | April 5, 2011 | Reply

  14. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren « Blue Skies | April 9, 2011 | Reply

  15. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Hello world! | Pope Pleads | April 25, 2011 | Reply

  16. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by Pope Prays | April 26, 2011 | Reply

  17. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by The Synoptic “Q Source” « Eye of a Needle | April 27, 2011 | Reply

  18. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Abomination of Desolation: Part one | The Keep | May 25, 2011 | Reply

  19. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by ABOMINATION THAT MAKETH DESOLATE | The Drawbridge | November 4, 2011 | Reply

  20. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by JFK Assassination, CBS News and the Second Vatican Council « Eye of a Needle | November 29, 2011 | Reply

  21. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Wresting With the Bible and the Press « Blue Skies | March 2, 2012 | Reply

  22. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Merangue’s Articles « Blue Skies | March 2, 2012 | Reply

  23. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Merangue’s Articles | The Keep | March 29, 2012 | Reply

  24. […] O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository […]

    Pingback by The JFK Challenger to the Power of Lies « Eye of a Needle | April 28, 2012 | Reply

  25. […] O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository […]

    Pingback by President Obama Spiking Hardball « Blue Skies | April 29, 2012 | Reply

  26. […] as Kenneth O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository […]

    Pingback by Ted Nugent and CBS Playing Hardball | The Drawbridge | May 6, 2012 | Reply

  27. […] as Kenneth O’Donnell and David Powers) , the Warren Commission, Rick Warren, the Saddlebacks and The Chief Priests and the Legion, the Evangelicals, The RCC, the Q Source, the Presidential Museums and the School Book Depository […]

    Pingback by The Pope, the Kennedys and the Media | Pope Prays | May 18, 2012 | Reply

  28. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by CBS News and JFK (The Adamant Machine) Parts 16-18 « CBS News and JFK Transcriptions | July 28, 2012 | Reply

  29. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by Newtown Massacre – The Hoax? « The Drawbridge | December 23, 2012 | Reply

  30. Yeast infection cannot be eliminated if only treated with a one-dimensional treatment like antibiotics, creams, pills, or detox diets.
    If so, taking steps like trying to prevent further injury or loss of blood
    are the most important thing you can do. Thanksgiving day is coming, I
    should buy a thanksgiving gift for Linda. , one of the chiropractors in Fayetteville, is pleased to announce the implementation of programs for natural detoxification therapy.

    The delivery of Linda Mc – Cartney sausage rolls package is usually in frozen form.

    Comment by Carroll | March 7, 2013 | Reply

  31. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by Michelle Obama, Where’d You Get Those Peepers | THE TURRET | June 26, 2013 | Reply

  32. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by The Strategy to Win War Against Terrorism | The Keep | August 5, 2013 | Reply

  33. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised This post is about a little girl in the bible that dies supposedly and is healed but no one is supposed to relate the story which they do. It tells about the people around the little girl who were weeping and then started laughing. Anyway you might check it out. It’s a matter of trust and if you use your kids as shields it’s hard to believe you care about them or they aren’t just acting because they have been taught to to lie and so it is hard to take seriously. Like Obamas tears. […]

    Pingback by Michelle Obama, School Lunches, and Benghazi « Blue Skies | July 21, 2014 | Reply

  34. […] Chief Priests and the Legion – Revised […]

    Pingback by The Malaysian Airliners, the State Department and Iraq « Eye of a Needle | July 24, 2014 | Reply

  35. […] Chief Priests and the Legion […]

    Pingback by Before Abraham Was I Am (thinking out loud) « Eye of a Needle | August 6, 2014 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: